The Sound – What I Hear Vs. What the Audience Hears

When I was shopping for my first cello back in summer 2017, many people advised me to test the cello in different environments as well as have a trusted cello person, listen to you play because a cello always sounds different from a players perspective vs. audience perspective.  I’ve heard other say to have people play the cello I am considering but the other person may or may not make the cello sound different / better / worse than me so that kind of worked.

But how can I hear what the cello sounds like from the front of the cello when I play?  I’ve taken audio recorders to record myself play and that worked quite well but I couldn’t directly compare how it sounded from behind the cello vs in front of the cello because there is always a delay – you know, I have stop recording, plug in headphones to the recorder and then play it back.   I wanted to take it one step further.  I wanted a direct comparison between.  This year, I purchased two identical audio recorders so I could record my daughter’s classical guitar ensemble and solo performances and I am using them to test, “Does a cello sound different from the cellist vs audience perspectives?”

In the video you will see the words “Audience” or “Cellist” appear.  “Audience” shows that the audio from the front recorder is being played, while the “Cellist” shows that recorder near my head is being played.

If you listen to it carefully, you can hear that the two perspectives have subtle, different sounds.  There is something about YouTube compression that makes it a bit more difficult to hear the differences.  On my video files watched on my computer, definitely easier to near the differences.  IMO the cellist perspective produces a dryer sound.

This was an interesting experiment, I’m not sure if there is enough difference with this setup that come to a conclusion.  I’d like to do another test in a music hall with the “Audience” recorder placed further away.

Technical details

I recorded this in my family with two story tall ceiling, with laminate floors. I am using two identical Zoom H2N’s audio recorders, recording simultaneously, with the same recording settings – 256kbps recorded in MP3 file format.  The audio gain for both audio recorders were set to 7.  I used Adobe Premiere to Sync the video and the two audio files.  I edited the video files to make the colors more interesting.  I did not alter the sound quality nor volume of the audio files.

This is the Adobe Premiere Pro timeline that shows how the Video and Audio files were put together.

IMG_2605.jpg

The H2n recording the cellist perspective was mounted on a tripod as close to my left ear as I could place it (actually it was so close, it actually impeded my left arm motion, just a little). IMG_2587.jpg

The second recorder I mounted on another tripod about 4 ft high and 8 feet away.  Sorry I forgot to take photo of this part.

3 thoughts on “The Sound – What I Hear Vs. What the Audience Hears

  1. The cellist sound is definitely affected by the person being so close to the cello. It’s as if the cello is surrounded by the person playing it and that is an absolutely important part of hearing the music. I think often of playing while surrounding the instrument that is speaking, it’s definitely an emotional connection so the sound definitely is affected for me, the cellist.

    The audience sound seems to come off the face of the cello. There’s a ricochet quality that is more brittle but very appealing. This reminds of the biology of animals and acoustical body structures. The cello naturally is using it’s face to send, reflect sound.

    Like

  2. Interesting. Yes, definitely a dryer sound here form the cellist’s perspective. My previous cello was the opposite. On more than one occasion a fine player who was not impressed with the instrument sat down to try it themselves, and was pleasantly surprised. My luthier once explained to me why this was so, but sadly, I’ve forgotten his explanation.

    Like

Leave a comment